<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Memories&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/</link>
	<description>Horse racing tips, analysis and statistics.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 14:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon D</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 00:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1640#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Have got 5 out of 6 more than once, but all short odds except the occasion of a Pontefract night meeting a few years ago, where full cover from trebles upwards, 10p unit stakes, returned just over £900 for a cost of £4.10. This was when I was religiously covering all my newspaper's forecast 2nd favs with that bet, every meeting every day for a couple of months. Also had a payout of £100 from Windsor on the same day as Pontefract, so over £1,000 returned that day. There were also innumerable smaller wins over the two months, including £20ers, £30ers. I was well in front overall, but stopped after a bad run in August.

 I did calculate that, in theory, the system should make a minimum £5,000 per annum profit, cost per annum approx £5,970, or just over £114 per week. So there's a free system for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have got 5 out of 6 more than once, but all short odds except the occasion of a Pontefract night meeting a few years ago, where full cover from trebles upwards, 10p unit stakes, returned just over £900 for a cost of £4.10. This was when I was religiously covering all my newspaper&#8217;s forecast 2nd favs with that bet, every meeting every day for a couple of months. Also had a payout of £100 from Windsor on the same day as Pontefract, so over £1,000 returned that day. There were also innumerable smaller wins over the two months, including £20ers, £30ers. I was well in front overall, but stopped after a bad run in August.</p>
<p> I did calculate that, in theory, the system should make a minimum £5,000 per annum profit, cost per annum approx £5,970, or just over £114 per week. So there&#8217;s a free system for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pervaishen</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/#comment-688</link>
		<dc:creator>Pervaishen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1640#comment-688</guid>
		<description>Dear Gavin
I like the pithy, down-to-earth style of your self commentary.
You sound somewhat more honest/ less of a swollen head than Matt who can be a bit obtuse with his flowery metaphors.
I do enjoy you both though.
Matt with his involved and articulate constructions and you with your understated achievement with your betting.
Keep it up.
P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Gavin<br />
I like the pithy, down-to-earth style of your self commentary.<br />
You sound somewhat more honest/ less of a swollen head than Matt who can be a bit obtuse with his flowery metaphors.<br />
I do enjoy you both though.<br />
Matt with his involved and articulate constructions and you with your understated achievement with your betting.<br />
Keep it up.<br />
P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Colledge</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Colledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1640#comment-679</guid>
		<description>went through the card one day at Ascot in the 60s with my dad. We got a txi home and a bottle of champers. Lovely! (Never done it since!) Well done, Gavin; never forgotten eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>went through the card one day at Ascot in the 60s with my dad. We got a txi home and a bottle of champers. Lovely! (Never done it since!) Well done, Gavin; never forgotten eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Ford</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1640#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Hi Gavin,

What would be your staking for these 5 selections. 1 Single and 10 Trebles?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gavin,</p>
<p>What would be your staking for these 5 selections. 1 Single and 10 Trebles?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Hoddell</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/memories/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Hoddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1640#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Hi Gavin,

Brilliant!

I once went through the card at Cheltenham......not the festival, but the May(is it?) meeting).
From memory I had e/w six fold, five folds etc to small stakes, Im mean 5p-25p. 
The bookies, I'm told love people who do accers.
.....and I love doin' them....


Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gavin,</p>
<p>Brilliant!</p>
<p>I once went through the card at Cheltenham&#8230;&#8230;not the festival, but the May(is it?) meeting).<br />
From memory I had e/w six fold, five folds etc to small stakes, Im mean 5p-25p.<br />
The bookies, I&#8217;m told love people who do accers.<br />
&#8230;..and I love doin&#8217; them&#8230;.</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


