<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheltenham 2010 cont&#8230;.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/</link>
	<description>Horse racing tips, analysis and statistics.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SCOTT</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/#comment-4967</link>
		<dc:creator>SCOTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1730#comment-4967</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href="http://cheaptabletsonline.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;CheapTabletsOnline.Com. Canadian Health&amp;Care.Best quality drugs.No prescription online pharmacy.Special Internet Prices. High quality pills. Buy drugs online&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;/strong&gt;

Buy:Super Active ED Pack.Propecia.Tramadol.Cialis.Soma.Viagra Professional.Viagra.Cialis Professional.Cialis Super Active+.Levitra.VPXL.Viagra Super Force.Cialis Soft Tabs.Maxaman.Zithromax.Viagra Super Active+.Viagra Soft Tabs....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><br />
<blockquote><a href="http://cheaptabletsonline.com/" rel="nofollow">CheapTabletsOnline.Com. Canadian Health&amp;Care.Best quality drugs.No prescription online pharmacy.Special Internet Prices. High quality pills. Buy drugs online</a>&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></p>
<p>Buy:Super Active ED Pack.Propecia.Tramadol.Cialis.Soma.Viagra Professional.Viagra.Cialis Professional.Cialis Super Active+.Levitra.VPXL.Viagra Super Force.Cialis Soft Tabs.Maxaman.Zithromax.Viagra Super Active+.Viagra Soft Tabs&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/#comment-1007</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1730#comment-1007</guid>
		<description>Hi Ross,

Unfortunately I didn't come across the Montjeu stat until very recently. It puts a slight dampener on Westlin Winds chance but as you rightly say, 'there will always be trend busters'. Or as Peter said there are 'lies, damn lies and statistics'.

22/1 in the frame will do for me :)

Gavin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ross,</p>
<p>Unfortunately I didn&#8217;t come across the Montjeu stat until very recently. It puts a slight dampener on Westlin Winds chance but as you rightly say, &#8216;there will always be trend busters&#8217;. Or as Peter said there are &#8216;lies, damn lies and statistics&#8217;.</p>
<p>22/1 in the frame will do for me <img src='http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Gavin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/#comment-1006</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 11:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1730#comment-1006</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

According to my stats Presenting has had 6 winners from 58 runners but if you break it down to 3mile+ races this figure becomes 5 from 32 (15.6%). If you want to break it down by obstacle it's 4/30 over fences, 1/21 over hurdles and 1/7 in the Bumper. The Bumper winner was the mighty Dunguib.

Pretty good figures I would think...

Gavin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>According to my stats Presenting has had 6 winners from 58 runners but if you break it down to 3mile+ races this figure becomes 5 from 32 (15.6%). If you want to break it down by obstacle it&#8217;s 4/30 over fences, 1/21 over hurdles and 1/7 in the Bumper. The Bumper winner was the mighty Dunguib.</p>
<p>Pretty good figures I would think&#8230;</p>
<p>Gavin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Arrandale</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/#comment-1003</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Arrandale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 00:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1730#comment-1003</guid>
		<description>Hi Gavin,
Just bought the festival trends guide recently,
and after reading the ante-post reviews i decided to have an
ew bet on Westlin'Winds.Having just read your stats.on Montjeu
it is not very promising.Montjeu is the sire of Westlin'Winds,
and out of his progeny 32 have raced at Cheltenham with 0 winners
and just 7 placed.However i still think we have a good chance of
collecting as there will always be trend busters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gavin,<br />
Just bought the festival trends guide recently,<br />
and after reading the ante-post reviews i decided to have an<br />
ew bet on Westlin&#8217;Winds.Having just read your stats.on Montjeu<br />
it is not very promising.Montjeu is the sire of Westlin&#8217;Winds,<br />
and out of his progeny 32 have raced at Cheltenham with 0 winners<br />
and just 7 placed.However i still think we have a good chance of<br />
collecting as there will always be trend busters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fell</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/#comment-1002</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1730#comment-1002</guid>
		<description>Gavin 
Going back to the stat about horses who sire winners at cheltenham, i believe Presenting has an excellent record there, if you look at some of the winners from 2009 you will see that ther were 3 or 4 winners from Presenting , don't know where i've picked that up from but it is another decent stat , i'm not sure if the prercentage is stronger in hurdles or chases but it's something i will be looking at again this year .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavin<br />
Going back to the stat about horses who sire winners at cheltenham, i believe Presenting has an excellent record there, if you look at some of the winners from 2009 you will see that ther were 3 or 4 winners from Presenting , don&#8217;t know where i&#8217;ve picked that up from but it is another decent stat , i&#8217;m not sure if the prercentage is stronger in hurdles or chases but it&#8217;s something i will be looking at again this year .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Hodges</title>
		<link>http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/cheltenham-2010-cont/#comment-1000</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Hodges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nag-nag-nag.co.uk/?p=1730#comment-1000</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the stats Gavin, I will bear them in mind when I bet at Cheltenham, but I'm mindful of the phrase " Lies, damned lies and statistics. Having said that, I think they should help to point everyone in the right direction.
              Best of luck Pete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the stats Gavin, I will bear them in mind when I bet at Cheltenham, but I&#8217;m mindful of the phrase &#8221; Lies, damned lies and statistics. Having said that, I think they should help to point everyone in the right direction.<br />
              Best of luck Pete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


